I recall having a conversation many years back with a professional services (PS) leader based in the Netherlands about resource management. He held a strong belief that resource management, or staffing, was better and more efficient when controlled locally or within the geography (or GEO). He was very adamant that staffing managing consultants, contractors, and project managers on billable projects was more effectively accomplished if they were controlled by the professional service organization that resided within the GEO. His justifications were that the GEO was most familiar with the skill sets and the availability of the resources, prior customer engagements/projects, and which resources were better suited with being deployed to customers, as some had very good standing relations with them.
While he had some valid points and justifications, I had a very different view of resource management, which I will share with you now. It's my opinion that moving to a global or central environment for managing staffing needs on billable projects would provide more scalability, efficiency, increase overall utilization, and potentially help to reduce mean-time to delivery. To further explain, here are some thoughts on the challenges and benefits on resource management based on a local/GEO model compared to a global/centralized model.