At TSIA, we've received a lot of inquiries from our members who are having a hard time selling project management with their professional services engagements. In looking at our data and speaking with services sales people, we've found that this issue is just one part of a much larger problem: the value a mature project management capability can bring to a project is not being fully understood on both sides of the deal. After all, if the value of project management isn't being communicated to sales, how can they be expected to convince your customers they need it?
I recall having a conversation many years back with a professional services (PS) leader based in the Netherlands about resource management. He held a strong belief that resource management, or staffing, was better and more efficient when controlled locally or within the geography (or GEO). He was very adamant that staffing managing consultants, contractors, and project managers on billable projects was more effectively accomplished if they were controlled by the professional service organization that resided within the GEO. His justifications were that the GEO was most familiar with the skill sets and the availability of the resources, prior customer engagements/projects, and which resources were better suited with being deployed to customers, as some had very good standing relations with them.
While he had some valid points and justifications, I had a very different view of resource management, which I will share with you now. It's my opinion that moving to a global or central environment for managing staffing needs on billable projects would provide more scalability, efficiency, increase overall utilization, and potentially help to reduce mean-time to delivery. To further explain, here are some thoughts on the challenges and benefits on resource management based on a local/GEO model compared to a global/centralized model.
Copyright 2017 by TSIA. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Inside Technology Services is an editorial blog published by TSIA, with contributing authors submitting regular editorial content. Opinions expressed by contributors are not necessarily those of TSIA. Although carefully verified, data are not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. TSIA cannot be held responsible for any direct or incidental loss by applying any of the information in this publication. The third-party trademarks appearing within are the property of their respective owners. All other trademarks appearing herein are the property of TSIA or its affiliates.